Memaknai Diskriminasi: Pengalaman Hidup Perempuan Tunanetra dalam Perspektif Fenomenologi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61412/jnsi.v5i1.312Keywords:
discrimination, blind women, phenomenology, symbolic interaction, subjective meaning, HWDI, social inclusionAbstract
Abstract
Discrimination against blind women represents a complex phenomenon that intertwines gender inequality with disability stigma. This study aims to examine how they understand and respond to discriminatory experiences in their everyday lives using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Data were collected from eight members of the Indonesian Women with Disabilities Association (HWDI) in Polewali Mandar through interviews, participant observation, and document analysis. The findings reveal that discrimination occurs across family, social, and economic domains, and is experienced as being invisible, being devalued, and losing control over personal life. Nevertheless, the informants negotiate these experiences through self-reflection, religious beliefs, and support from HWDI as a space for identity recovery. This study concludes that discrimination is not merely a factual event but a social process that shapes self-concept and survival strategies, emphasizing blind women’s role as active subjects while contributing to the literature on disability sociology and inclusive policy development.
References
Afifah. (n.d.). Perempuan dalam konstitusi Indonesia.
Ahmadi, D. (2008). Interaksi simbolik: Suatu pengantar. Mediator, 9(2), 301–316.
Alimatul Qibtiyah, N., dkk. (2022). Perempuan dan disabilitas: Hambatan ganda dalam kehidupan sosial. Jurnal Gender dan Inklusi, 14(1), 22–35.
Ariyanti, D., & Ardhana, I. K. (2020). Dampak psikologis perempuan korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di Bali. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 7(1), 11–21.
Bouterse, L. J. (2014). Verstehen and social meaning: Revisiting Weber. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(4), 340–356.
Budiati, A. (2010). Nilai budaya sebagai penghambat aktualisasi perempuan. Jurnal Perempuan dan Budaya, 5(1), 45–56.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design (5th ed.). Sage.
Dian Utami, A., dkk. (2022). Pembangunan inklusif berbasis gender dan disabilitas. Jurnal Inklusi, 9(1), 33–49.
Equal Measures 2030. (n.d.). Global report on gender equality. Equal Measures 2030.
Fitrianti, N., & Habibullah. (2012). Diskriminasi gender dalam pendidikan di Karawang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Gender, 2(1), 77–88.
Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage.
Hastuti, D. (2005). Kendala sosial budaya dalam pengarusutamaan gender di Indonesia. Jurnal Gender Indonesia, 1(2), 101–115.
Hastuti, R., dkk. (2020). Hambatan disabilitas dalam pembangunan inklusif. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 8(1), 55–67.
Hermawati, E. (2007). Patriarki dalam budaya Jawa. Jurnal Budaya Nusantara, 3(1), 23–34.
Hidayati, L. (2016). Peran ganda perempuan bekerja. Jurnal Gender dan Pembangunan, 4(2), 77–92.
Huda, A. (2020). Perempuan Samin dan budaya patriarki di Bojonegoro. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 41(2), 155–168.
Hutchison, E. (2015). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Routledge.
Israpil. (2017). Sejarah budaya patriarki di Indonesia. Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, 11(2), 211–227.
Kania, D. (2015). Hak-hak perempuan dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Gender, 7(1), 56–71.
Kholil. (n.d.). Kritik feminisme dalam studi Islam. Jurnal Studi Islam, 10(2), 122–135.
Khotimah, H. (2009). Diskriminasi gender di dunia kerja. Jurnal Kesetaraan, 2(1), 67–81.
Mabaquiao, N. (2005). Husserlian phenomenology and consciousness. Philosophy Today, 49(2), 131–140.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Nasri, Y. (2017). Bias gender dalam novel Padusi. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(1), 11–20.
Nurcahyo, R. (2016). Patriarki dan representasi politik perempuan di Indonesia. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 2(2), 77–94.
Omara, F. (2004). Patriarki dalam simbol budaya. Jurnal Antropologi, 8(1), 44–61.
Padilla, A. (2003). Phenomenology and disability studies. Disability & Society, 18(2), 215–231.
Permana, A., & Maulana, R. (2020). Marginalisasi perempuan dalam cerpen Inem. Jurnal Humaniora, 12(1), 88–97.
Puspitawati, H. (2012a). Analisis gender dan keluarga. Bogor: IPB Press.
Puspitawati, H. (2012b). Konsep gender dalam pembangunan. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 14(3), 27–40.
Rahminawati, N. (2001). Bias gender dalam isu kesetaraan. Jurnal Studi Gender, 6(1), 65–79.
Ramadhani, I. (2016). Peran ganda perempuan dan dampaknya. Jurnal Psikologi dan Masyarakat, 8(1), 45–57.
Rokhimah, R. (2014). Budaya patriarki di masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi, 5(1), 34–50.
Sakina, A., & Siti, K. (2017). Budaya patriarki sebagai penghambat kesetaraan gender. Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender, 9(1), 20–31.
Siregar, M. (2011). Teori interaksi simbolik George Herbert Mead. Jurnal Komunikasi, 5(2), 77–88.
Sue, D. W. (2006). Multicultural social work practice. Wiley.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suharto, E. (2006). Membangun masyarakat memberdayakan rakyat. Refika Aditama.
Susanto, T. (2015). Budaya patriarki dan kesetaraan gender. Jurnal Sosiologi dan Gender, 7(2), 33–48.
Syafe’i, I. (2015). Subordinasi perempuan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Sosial dan Gender, 4(2), 56–71.
UNDP. (2019). Human development report 2019: Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today. United Nations Development Programme.
United Nations Population Fund. (n.d.). Survei nasional kekerasan terhadap perempuan. UNFPA Indonesia.
Unsriana, M. (2014). Diskriminasi gender dalam sastra Jepang. Jurnal Humaniora Jepang, 9(1), 12–27.
Wibowo, A. (2011). Ketidaksetaraan peran gender dalam keluarga. Jurnal Sosiologi Keluarga, 3(1), 22–39.
Yusalia, D. (2014). Gender mainstreaming dalam budaya patriarki. Jurnal Kajian Gender, 10(2), 101–115.
Zahara, R., Liestyasari, D., & Nurhadi. (2015). Tantangan pendidikan adil gender di pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 88–99.
